NSW labor and rspca lawyers in MONEY LAUNDERING MAFIA

including the FORUM on the FRAUD & CORRUPTION of Australian labor and Kevin Rudd
This is the Australian segment or STRATUM of the SELF HELP FREEDOM, INDEPENDENCE & JUSTICE WebSite and Bulletin Board. Together with the Dob in a Shonk Bulletin Board - Australian Segment on the Shonks and Shysters Exposed website, and the Rate Australian Judges website, it comprises the HEART of the Global Internet Self Help JUSTICE NETWORK (Australian Stratum), where the whole conept is explained in detail together with all the links. Users can do a little at a time until they understand how it all fits together. No-one has to do it all at the one time. Users can continue to edit their postings on our sites to link them all together; all the time improving their publicity. Since much injustice and bullying arises from Shonks and Shysters targeting/attacking Disabled people, we have integrated and linked this network into the Global Disability Network - (Australian Stratum).

NSW labor and rspca lawyers in MONEY LAUNDERING MAFIA

Postby russellm » Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:45 am

The below letter dated 10 February, 2008 refer to the matter re the further criminal acts by the New South Wales [NSW] rspca and labor government MAFIA in New South Wales [NSW] Australia that is mentioned in
FOURTH POST at http://bewarerspca.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10 /, and more to come at

My FIRST post re Sandra's being BULLIED & DEFRAUDED by the rspca NSW labor MAFIA, is in Site admin, the 4th posting in this TOPIC,
Sandra's case in BEWARErspca Australian forum /.
NSW labor and rspca lawyers in MONEY LAUNDERING MAFIA /.
Lawyer HEAD of rspca directs YOUR DONATIONS to his LAW FIRM /.
HIS OWN LAW firm LAUNDERS MONEY for NSW labor & rscpa MAFIA Head /.
HIS OWN LAW firm LAUNDERS MONEY for NSW labor & rscpa MAFIA Director /.
Anglicare of the Anglican Church HELPS rspca labor MAFIA /.
There are a number of corrupt and evil aspects to this saga. The evil concerns a NSW MAFIA of LAWYERS, their LAW FIRMS, THE labor government of NSW, those LAWYERS conniving their way into 'running' the rspca in NSW, defrauding and bullying disabled persons, and stealing their wealth/assets, using a corrupt legal/court system, to LAUNDER CRIMINAL PROCEEDS, and STEAL the GENEROSITY of DECENT ANIMAL LOVERS of NSW.
The below letter from Sandra, the disabled victim of LAWYER AND rspca CRIMINALS MAFIA, SUPPORTED by the NSW labor government, is re-produced in a number of relevant forums as detailed here. In each forum, the part of Sandra's letter relevant to this FORUM is ENLARGED & EMBOLDENED.
NSW Attorner-General, Hatzistergos' his Reply is published in the post below this letter in viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9 /.:

Fascimilie communique from Sandra to Hatzistergos, NSW Attorner-General; Sandra wrote:

Contact Mr Hatzistergos in his capacity as Member of the Legislative Council
Address The Hon. John Hatzistergos,
Parliament House,
Macquarie Street,
Sydney NSW 2000
Phone (02) 9230 3463
Fax (02) 9228 3600
Email office@hatzistergos.minister.nsw.gov.au

Our ref:
Your ref:
10 February 2008
Attention: The Hon. John Hatzistergos
Minister for Justice & Attorney General URGENT
Parliament House
Macquarie Street
By Facsimile: 02 92283600 
Dear Minister,

I am writing this letter to request that you exercise your powers under section 5 of the Crimes (Local Courts Appeal and Review) Act 2001 an annul my convictions, the details of which are set out below.
I am currently in receipt of a disability pension due to my severe anxiety and depression. I have been totally disabled since mid-1993 when I was involuntarily retired from secondary school teaching with the NSW Department of Education.
In December 2002 I was able to re-enter the workforce for a few hours per week stacking supermarket shelves.  I have now recovered to the point where I have been able to return to teaching on a casual basis. My situation was continuing to improve until September 2006 when the RSPCA seized my horses without any warning.
On the 9 July 2007, as a result of the RSPCA seizures, I pleaded guilty to an RSPCA prosecution involving four allegations of failing to provide proper and sufficient food to four of my horses along with a further four counts of failing to provide Veterinary treatment to those horses in the Moss Vale Local Court. I did not believe I was guilty of any such offences at that time.
Reason for Application:
The basis of my application pursuant to s5 is that I do not believe that I am actually guilty of the offences and at the time I entered my plea of guilty I did so only on the basis that I thought I would get two of my horses back (all four horses had been confiscated by the RSPCA). I have set out the circumstances as to how I came to make that plea below.
Due to my personal financial situation and mental health, I was unable to obtain legal advice and representation prior to my case being heard on July 9 2007. 
I believed myself to be innocent of the 8 charges (and still do) and had every intention of pleading not guilty as I had done at the two prior hearings even though I was not in a position to adequately defend myself. 
I had been warned by the magistrate in February that if I were to plead not guilty and be found guilty,  I would be likely to be up for costs of "many, many thousands of dollars". Some people who advised me, including the helpers at Anglicare, thought I had no option to plead guilty because of the financial implications.  I did not agree with this but it was in my mind.
Prior to the July hearing, in December of 2006 during my first appearance in court on this matter,  RSPCA had successfully applied to the court to take ownership of my four horses, which they had seized, in order to sell them by tender.  I was to be allowed to tender for them and did so.  However in February or early March of 2007 I received a letter from RSPCA informing me that two of my horses had been sold to another bidder,  and the remaining two on which the I was the highest bidder were to be retained by RSPCA until the outcome of the court proceedings. 
I was totally devastated at the loss of these two horses, both of whom I dearly loved,  had bred myself and raised,  and one of which would have never been for sale.  It was especially unfair as these particular horses had been absolutely fine when seized by RSPCA.
At the courthouse on July 9 2007 I was an unrepresented defendant and was forced to speak directly with the RSPCA Inspector and the RSPCA’s barrister and instructing solicitor.  At this time I was informed by the Barrister that the two horses of mine which I had previously been notified had been were not in fact sold and were still in the RSPCA’s possession.
The realization that my horses were still available to perhaps be returned to me was both a huge shock and relief to me. I was very relieved but upset and I broke down emotionally and said "I will plead guilty if you will give me three horses back". In response to this statement I received a “deal” from the Barrister that I would be able to have two of the horses returned to me if I pleaded guilty. I did not believe I was guilty and I was quite clear when speaking to the Barrister as to why I was pleading guilty, not because I thought I was, but just so as to get my horses back. 
With the benefit of hindsight and clear thought I now realise that I should never have agreed to plead guilty. At the time I was acting upon my emotions upon finding that my beloved horses were not gone.  Since the date of conviction I have had an opportunity to speak to a solicitor about the conversation that I had on that date with the Barrister. Upon my instructions as to what took place I have been informed that what I did in pleading guilty in this manner was not a true plea of guilty at all and that it should have been made abundantly clear to the court by the prosecuting authority (the RSPCA) that there was a “deal” behind the plea of guilty which would have alerted the court to the fact that my plea was not a true or genuine plea of guilty at all. The solicitor that I have since spoken to and obtained advice from has advised me that had the surrounding circumstances of the plea been known to the court it would have been obliged to pry into my basis for pleading guilty and ultimately, upon being told my reasoning for the pleas of guilty, the court would not have been able to accept those pleas as they were not genuine pleas of guilty. I have been advised that these pleas were made under a duress and were made in response to the incentive offered by the RSPCA in accepting my misguided willingness to plead guilty in return for the return of my horses.
I told the Barrister representing RSPCA that I wasn't pleading guilty because I believed I was,  but because I could get my horses back.  I also stated to him that I didn't have the emotional and physical resources to fight them.  He took all of this into account and went ahead and presented my guilty plea. 
Having never been in a court proceeding before I didn't understand the manner in which proceedings were conducted and I was shocked to find the magistrate commenting on evidence contained in a fact sheet which the RSPCA had given him which was totally untrue and which he used to condemn me severely.  I had no idea that the version set out in their document would go before a magistrate and certainly didn't know that I was seen to be accepting all this so called evidence by pleading guilty. I had merely done what had to be done to get my horses back – I did not believe I was guilty.
During the course of the meeting with the Barrister from the RSPCA I was drawn into negotiations of some sort of deal to be presented to the magistrate regarding costs and a bond.  I really didn't take it all in because I was just overwhelmed at knowing my horses would come back to me. The barrister spoke to me and the inspector about any conditions regarding all my other animals, which include 14 horses and 6 dogs.  The inspector indicated she had no concerns at all about them and she knew them.   I mentioned that if I were to plead guilty it may ruin my reputation and ability to continue in my fields of agricultural education,  horse breeding,  horse and rider training and judging.  At that point the barrister and the inspector both agreed that there were no press officers in attendance and I should be able to go back to my life and about my business.  However the RSPCA released a damning press statement to the local paper which was put on the front page of the paper with my name and address.  Only then did the full situation hit me.  I believe I was conned and taken advantage of as an easy target. 
 I, like many people, had admired the work of the RSPCA and thus never even thought of the possibility that they could act maliciously but I now believe they did so in this case.  Once they have seized animals, they invariably prosecute I am now aware,  and will go to great lengths to achieve a conviction. A further disappointing aspect became known to me in the following week or so.  At some point on the process, at the stage of charging me,  the RSPCA had put a code for one of the charges which did not match the description.  The charge described was "fail to provide proper and suffiicient food".  The code was for committing an act of aggravated cruelty.  I find it hard to believe that this could go before so many lawyers and a magistrate and no one notice this.  The end result is that I have a conviction for aggravated cruelty due to a coding error.
This concludes my request however I have kept it to the most basic facts,  and not included quite a bit of background information and details of conversations between myself and RSPCA,  as well as the abusive behaviour of a senior RSPCA Inspector to myself and two members of the public outside the courthouse in December,  where RSPCA went back on their advice that they would release the horses back to me if I could pay the cost of feed from the time they were seized,  which I was prepared to do,  and many other connected matters.  I am certainly prepared to provide you with a much more detailed account if you desire it.
I thank you for your time in considering my request and ask that you please,  in the interests of justice, grant an annulment under Section 5 of the Local Court Appeal and Review Act and allow me to reverse my plea of guilty in this matter and receive a proper hearing.
Yours faithfully,

Sandra ****** 
******** NSW 2577
[Hatzistergos received those identification details that are here deleted.] 

[MY 1st post re Sandra in Site admin
4th post in http://bewarerspca.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10 /,
Sandra's case in BEWARErspca Australian forum
http://bewarerspca.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=50 /.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9 /.

in GDN
http://globaldisabilitynetwork.com/foru ... hp?f=9&t=9 /.

Lawyer HEAD of NSW rspca DIVERTS YOUR DONATIONS to his own LAW firm/
Lawyer HEAD of rspca directs YOUR DONATIONS to his LAW FIRM
http://shonksandshysters.com/forum/view ... 5&p=16#p16 /.
http://shonksandshysters.com/forum/view ... ?f=13&t=16 /.

Corrupt Organisations
LAW firm LAUNDERS MONEY for NSW labor & rscpa head
http://haigreport.com/toastmastersforum ... p?f=4&t=13 /.
LAW firm LAUNDERS MONEY for NSWlabor&rscpaDirector
http://haigreport.com/toastmastersforum ... p?f=4&t=14 /.
Anglicare of the Anglican Church HELPS rspca labor MAFIA
http://haigreport.com/toastmastersforum ... p?f=4&t=15 /. 

CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:56 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest